Showing posts with label Disney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Disney. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

FCC 'Olympus Has Fallen' Fine -- Sign Of The Times

The fact the FCC has fined Viacom, Comcast, and Disney approximately two million dollars for running the 'Olympus Has Fallen' commercial (posted below) which begins with tones that are similar to the Emergency Alert System may not seem worthy of much attention however, to me, it seems like there's a bit more going on than meets the eye.

According to the NYT write up, the FCC says it has had little reason to enforce its 1994 policy which forbids fraudulent use of the EAS signal but "...for reasons that the commission said it had not determined, complaints have spiked recently, leading to at least four enforcement actions."

That hints at the real story. Why would people complain to the FCC because a commercial or movie trailer used EAS warning tones? Why would anyone care?

I remember when we would ignore those beeps. They would hardly register and most people wouldn't look up from making a sandwich if they heard the warning from the TV in the next room. In fact, I'd be annoyed whenever a TV station would test the EAS system because it upset my viewing regimen. The start of that announcement -- "This is a test..." -- would pretty much piss me off. I'd be counting seconds till the regularly scheduled show would resume, idiotic though it may have been (both the show and the counting).

So, why the sudden uptick in complaints? Why, after twenty years of it being illegal to use EAS-type audibles in a trivial fashion have people recently begun to demand the FCC to do something about such usage? Employing a bit of logic, that would have to be due to the fact we care more than we used to, because the EAS announcement means something to us. And, why would that be, now, when it used to make us giggle, used to come off as an odd throwback to Cold War paranoia? Because, these days, we live in renewed fear of attack -- a situation we haven't had to deal with since the 50s or 60s when tensions between the U.S. and Soviet Union ran high and the possibility of a nuclear strike frightened us so much we trained our children to "Duck and Cover!" and ran drills where we hid under ours desks and shielded our eyes from the blinding light.

It may be reading between the lines but it seems obvious. Americans feel the next bombing or other use of deadly force in a politically motivated strike is imminent. Day to day we're on edge, perhaps a bit frayed, and don't much appreciate utilizing a system that is meant to inform us something terrible has happened, or could happen, in order to sell tickets to a movie.

This bit from the NYT story puts a fairly fine point on it:

"Around here in Southwest Missouri we are always on high alert for E.A.S. tones due to tornadoes," said one complaint the commission received, referring to the Emergency Alert System. The fake signal "had our entire family running to the TV to find out what was going on," the complaint said — and sounded real enough "that one of my children started to quickly get out of the bathtub thinking there was an emergency."

While that warning on TV used to mean as much as a car alarm going off up the block and we would respond accordingly if, that is, we even noticed the test had begun, now, when we hear those tones we dread very real possibilities. Yes, times have changed and, unfortunately, this is not a test.
















Friday, November 15, 2013

Busy British Humor: Not For Kids, Not For X-Mas

This style of comedy is fine and, being a BBC Films co-production (along with Disney), British pacing is to be expected, but it's verbally complex, quick, subtle, and if 'Saving Mr. Banks' needs to be accessible to kids, doesn't hold much appeal to most families. If they're hoping for average kids to demand that mom and dad take them out to see this movie, Mr. Banks won't be saving much bank.

On the other hand, if they're thinking adults by themselves will turn out -- well, same thing. What person over the age of 12 is going to want to see this? I can't see a theater full of 30-somethings watching Banks, and the opening date of December 20 almost precludes going alone or on a date. That time of year is for families -- with kids. The new Anchorman, or maybe Walking with Dinosaurs, would be the movies of choice for families, I would think, while Inside Llewyn Davis will be the destination for adults that weekend.

Then, there's the subject: Walt Disney's attempt to secure the rights to PL Travers' novel(s) about Mary Poppins. Does anyone even know who Mary Poppins is these days? Really. If you asked the average kid, would they know, would they look at you like you're dumb and rattle off the answer, or struggle because they recognize the name yet don't know a thing about the character?

So, this is a Disney movie through to its soul, yet not one that kids will be able to understand, or that families in general will want to run out and see, that opens around X-mas. That's just wrong.

The next weekend sees Mitty and Wallstreet Wolf battling it out with American Hustle still being a viable choice. If kids need a fix, 47 Ronin or, really, almost anything else besides Banks, should do the trick.

'Saving Mr. Banks' looks well done, snappy, but doesn't play like what families want to see around X-mas. Looking like a rental, or to be seen on TV.